Re: [Nmh-workers] reply attribution?

[Paul Fox]

ken wrote:
 > >so:  is reply attribution something that people that use replyfilter
 > >miss?
 > 
 > I don't miss it ... but it might be both harder and easier than you think
 > to add it.
 > 
 > "Harder" because replyfilter doesn't have access to the _headers_ of the
 > message (the short reason for that is because mhl is stupid).  That's
 > the reason you have the "formatarg" configuration parameters to mhl
 > that pass in the C-T and C-T-E headers.
 > 
 > "Easier" because you could add a fourth optional argument to the script
 > and add something like:
 > 
 >      formatarg="%(pretty{from}) writes"
 > 
 > To the appropriate line in your mhl reply file.

thanks for those tips.  i don't know that i'll do it anytime soon,
since i already have a solution, but maybe one of these days.

paul
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 72.9 degrees)