Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Paul,

> i was starting to think i was done with this, but i guess i'm not.

Rather that re-tread worn ground, how about a considered reply to my
suggestion that all headers be known to nmh and the user having to add
to that list, or pass it as the value of a `wire' header.  :-)
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2016-10/msg00189.html

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy