nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)


From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:37:19 -0400

>Regarding the questions that started this thread. I'd like it if #forw
>directives could specify attachments within a message. So if part 2 is
>an attached file, #forw +inbox 1.2 would mime attach the file. A Forward
>or Attach header could also provide a shortcut with a forw option to
>add those. forw -mime works but sometimes I want to strip out much of
>the message body or include only some attachments.

I alluded to this earlier, but this is hard given the structure of the
current code.  Maybe in the future when we get full MIME parsing.

--Ken



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]