Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

[bergman]

In the message dated: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:28:33 -0400,
The pithy ruminations from David Levine on 
<Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)> were:
=> Ken wrote:
=> 

=> 
=> > I don't see the value of having a special Nmh- prefix.
=> 
=> Traceability is valuable.

Agreed.

=> 
=> > If they happen to leak out in the wild,
=> > they won't harm anything since they're not official headers.
=> 
=> The won't harm anything, but how will Ralph know who to ask to fix it?
=> 
=> Does anyone manually insert "Attach:" into their draft messages?

Yes, but rarely....so rarely that I could easily stop if the header prefix 
changed.

Mark

=> 
=> David
=> 
=> _______________________________________________
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> address@hidden
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=> 
-- 
Mark Bergman    Biker, Rock Climber, SCUBA Diver, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stage
hand
'94 Yamaha GTS1000A^1                                         2015 Aprilia Capo
nord
address@hidden                         https://www.flickr.com/photos/rm
sppu

http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40panix.com

I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on:
rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters
15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman