[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution??? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:19:42 -0500 |
>There are three occurrences of the following, associated with
>Received: entries, in the header:
>
> (No client certificate requested)
>
>I'm guessing that those are harmless.
Yeah, I suspect that's from a TLS connection between client and server, and
the client didn't provide a certificate which is normal.
>There's also an "spf=softfail" in there.
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com <http://mx.google.com>;
> spf=softfail (google.com <http://google.com>: domain of
> transitioning address@hidden <address@hidden> does not designate
> 171.67.219.78 as permitted sender) address@hidden <address@hidden>;
> dkim=fail address@hidden <http://gmail.com>;
> dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
> <http://gmail.com>
>
>Note that 171.67.219.78 is smtp-grey.stanford.edu.
Huh. I'd be interested in looking at the whole Received: header chain,
but maybe I don't understand what is going wrong; it almost seems like
smtp-grey.stanford.edu is the one originating the email and that doesn't
make sense to me, if you're submitting directly to gmail. But yeah, I
suspect the failing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC tests is what is causing the
problem.
Okay, this header is actually defined in RFC 5451, see here:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5451
But I am still puzzled.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, David Levine, 2015/03/01
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/01
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, David Levine, 2015/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Emails being tagged as spam -- NMH solution???, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10