[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:17:26 -0400 |
>The format engine doesn't check for negative width, maybe it should.
According to the man page, wcwidth() returns -1 on error (really, that
means "not printable"). And it looks like negative return values from
wcwidth() are handled (although maybe not right).
For those having questions, in the nmh test directory there is a utility
called "getcwidth" that can tell you what wcwidth() will return for a
given character.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Paul Fox, 2014/08/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/25