[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject)
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject) |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:00:37 -0700 |
Jerrad Pierce <address@hidden> writes:
>>Further, it seems to me that it would not be hard to determine if
>>the text/plain and text/html parts are essentially identical.
>This is a more difficult problem than you imagine. You'd have to render
>the HTML, and then decide what "essentially identical" means. For many
>it would be differences in whitespace only, but for others a different
>definition may apply e.g; HTML is a superset of the plain text, and only
>contains additions.
Yes, I should amend "essentially identical" to "obviously to a
not very erudite algorithm]
essentially identical"
Norman Shapiro
- [Nmh-workers] A non-complaint, norm, 2014/08/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A non-complaint, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/06
- [Nmh-workers] (no subject), norm, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Jerrad Pierce, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Paul Fox, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/07
- [Nmh-workers] (no subject), Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/07