[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite |
Date: |
Sun, 11 May 2014 11:33:39 +0100 |
Hi Paul and Ken,
Paul wrote:
> but if we don't, should the conversion use 1024 ("2.4M") or 1000
> ("2.6M") as the divisor? and of course that leads to MB vs. MiB.
> and how many digits should there be after the decimal? sigh.
If it's base 2 then it must be Ki rather than K, etc. I don't think the
B is needed and can be assumed? The user can always add it as plain
text.
Ken wrote:
> I'm fine with 1000 as the divisor (that's what is done now, right?
> No, actually, I'm wrong; the divisor is >> 10). So I guess 1024 is
> fine as a divisor, actually ... I don't have strong feelings about
> that. A single letter indicating the metric prefix is fine to me.
Metric implies base 10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix has
lots of detail.
Paul wrote:
> as for the name: i'm not sold on "metric" either. something like
> "numabbrev", "numunits", or maybe "si_units"?
`si_units' have to be base 10. `units' suggests the function gives just
an appropriate unit for a size and not the size itself. How about
`kilo' and `kibi' functions, allowing the user to choose their base.
They obviously cope with more than K/Ki, and would be documented so, but
to me the names are immediately indicative of what they're doing and the
base used. The shipped files would continue to be base 2 by using kibi.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Paul Fox, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new marker format broke test suite, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/16