[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:17:53 -0400 |
ken wrote:
> >to be honest, i didn't remember that i could use mh-format to apply
> >the color directly, and since i was already colorizing headers using
> >sed, i just expanded that.
>
> Hey, that's fine. Just wanted to understand if it isn't useful to people.
>
> >i think i'd also want a unique syntax
> >anyway, since sometimes i want to remove the markers, not colorize
> >them. (hmmm... i suppose i could simply supply a null marker format in
> >that case.)
>
> Or maybe ...
>
> %<(null%(getenv NOCOLOR)) ..... do color stuff \
> %| .... do non-color stuff .... %>
>
> If that would work for you.
my last mail crossed with this one. this might work.
----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 38.1 degrees)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Paul Fox, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Paul Fox, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines, Ken Hornstein, 2014/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configurable part separator lines,
Paul Fox <=