Re: [Nmh-workers] First release candidate of nmh 1.6 now available

[Jerrad Pierce]

>> Possibly more of an issue is the contributions following out of
>> sync with updates. Perhaps a note should be included with each pointing
>> to any official project page/other source for the latest and greatest?
>
>If it's hosted somewhere, I don't see a need to redistribute it.
Path of least resistance for users, and also in case the official channel
disappears? (The Wayback Machine's coverage is not 100% afterall ;-)

>The FAQ has a very old list of "other software", we could break it out
>and update it.
Makes sense, FAQ could refer to a top-level README in the contribs folder.