[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:53:35 -0500 |
>More so, it was the '1.5' vs 1.5-RC*. Git doesn't make clear the
>distinctions between a tag and a branch. Because git doesn't really
>have a distinction between them. What I'm proposing is a naming scheme
>to help differentiate between the two.
One shows up under "git tag". The other shows up under "git branch".
Assuming we do annotated tags, you can even use git cat-file to
distinguish between the two even easier. I'm having a hard time
understanding the problem.
(The reason I am being a pain about this was that I thought I had a
reasonable naming scheme ALREADY in place for 1.5).
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- [Nmh-workers] nmh buildbots, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Paul Vixie, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6 Release Engineering, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07