[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:33:05 -0800 |
Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>--Apple-Mail=_AF71427D-04A1-4B09-8FA0-417117A9FFE1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset=us-ascii
>
>
>On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:14 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> What if you called it mh-1.6alpha, or even mh-1.5omega ?
>
>Because it isn't. Until we are actually approaching a release (i.e. in =
>feature freeze) this is just needless make-work for the developers. If =
>you want a snapshot release, all the tools for you to build one are in =
>the source tree. And on any form of modern hardware, going from =
>checkout to RPM takes about two minutes.
OK. I gave up. I will try my very best to be patient.
Norman Shapiro