nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again

From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:24:18 -0700 
On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Jerrad Pierce <address@hidden> wrote:

> Wouldn't a FUSE IMAP layer largely solve the problem of conflicts
> by working on the live data store? Perhaps a customization of
> something like:

No. nmh works in many places FUSE will never enjoin.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]