Re: [Nmh-workers] new command lacks lock

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Ken,

> But ...  would you be happy with an update to mh-sequence(5) ?  That's
> not a wonderful place either, because really that's something more
> involved with nmh internals, and there's nothing that really talks
> about how sequences are implemented.  I'm not even sure mh-sequence(5)
> is the right place, since that's talking about things from a user
> perspective.

It's the best place AFAICS.  Section 5 is file-formats anyway, so it
could detail .mh_sequences format, assuming it's there to be toyed with,
and how it's maintained by nmh.  Or perhaps that's mh_sequences(5)?

Cheers, Ralph.