[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?
From: |
heymanj |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:23:58 -0500 |
On 14 January 2013 at 9:06, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden>wrote:
>>> As long as I'm there ... is it alright if get rid of --with-editor?
>>> Hardcode a default of "vi"?
>>
>>+1. (Though it's optional under POSIX IIRC.)
>
> Well, we could always have the default be "ed", the standard text editor.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html
Nothing wrong with 'ed' :-)
Some of used the 'learn' command when first introduced to Unix, and
that was the editor that we were taught.
>
> --Ken
jerry
// Jerry Heyman | A government that is big enough to give
// Amigan Forever :-) | you everything you want, is big enough
\\ // heymanj at acm dot org | to take away everything you have
\X/ http://www.hobbeshollow.com| -- Thomas Jefferson
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Alexander Zangerl, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, chad, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, heymanj, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?,
heymanj <=