[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:50:40 -0500 |
chad wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2013, at 14:05, Paul Fox <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > ken wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, this means I get to ask a question of greybeards that I've always
> >> wondered about.
> >>
> >> What is the deal with VISUAL and EDITOR? I always set EDITOR; I've never
> >> set VISUAL. I've never understood what the difference is. I'm fine with
> >> making the hierarchy Editor: -> $VISUAL -> $EDITOR (and I think a default
> >> of 'vi' is fine), but I've always wondered why there are two environment
> >> variables.
> >
> > not all terminals were capable of doing the cursor addressing needed
> > for any given screen-oriented editor. so the user was given the ability
> > to configure two editors -- likely "ed" and "vi", though some folks may
> > have used emacs or "se" :-). some programs had separate commands for
> > invoking the two. (for instance, see ~e and ~v in the mailx man page.)
>
> I used one of these regularly, with mh, on a Palm V with an early
> cellular modem, around 1998-2000 or so. I really doubt there are
> people doing this any more.
>
> As a matter of practical old-fogey-ness, I wonder if people regularly
> use nmh on systems where vi isn't vim.
>
<cough>vile<cough>
but maybe that's just me. ;-)
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 42.4 degrees)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Fox, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Tethys, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Fox, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, chad, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Ditch autoconf selection of pager?, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/14