[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:17:52 -0400 |
>We already have \-processing, though output functions like putstr strip
>them.
Careful ... how that's implemented is a bit wonky.
Technically \-processing doesn't happen in the format code; it
happens in a function called new_fs() (sbr/fmt_new.c). Well,
new_fs() calls normalize(), but you get the idea. My point is that
by the time fmt_compile() is called all of the \-escapes have been
processed, so fmt_compile() doesn't "see" them.
> $ scan -format '%(lit a\tb\bc)' last | cat -A
> a b c$
> $
>
>How about adding \x1b to that with a new zputstr function that doesn't
>adjust column or filter the string.
We already have putlit that doesn't do the whitespace compression, so I
think zputlit makes more sense.
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?, David Levine, 2012/11/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?, David Levine, 2012/11/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?, David Levine, 2012/11/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?, David Levine, 2012/11/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?, David Levine, 2012/11/04