Re: [Nmh-workers] attach

[David Levine]

Oliver wrote:

> David Levine wrote:
> > Note that the current "attach -r" is an undocumented relic of the
> > implementation, because whatnow passes the -r to ls.  Maybe it
> > shouldn't even be allowed.  The whatnow documentation specifically
> > says "attach files".
>
> attach clearly passes any option you like to ls. And note that -r
> reverses the order of the files rather than making it recursive. If
> we keep the ls based implementation, it might be better to include
> an initial -- so options can't be used.

Does POSIX ls support -- ?

David