[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:29:46 -0700 |
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >I took rader's issue to be that the plain text he wrote to accompany the
> >PDF has come out as "application/octet-stream in base64"?
>
> Yeah, that's what I thought as well. That's what I tested and I couldn't
> reproduce. If that is happening then that's a bug, of course.
>
> --Ken
Been a while since I looked at this code. My recollection is that it would
come out as "application/octet-stream in base64" if the "plain text" was not
actually plain text, that is, if it had non-ASCII in it. Which is the right
thing to do, it's a user error, not a bug.
Jon
- [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior,
Jon Steinhart <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/08/09