Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs

[David Levine]

Valdis wrote:

> Looks good to me - but will some busticated software that assumes everything
> after the @ is syntactically (if not semantically) a "hostname" get upset at
> the + in there? (Personally, I don't care, all of my stuff just want a unique
> string inside the <>, and if my stuff is busted I'll beat the snot out of 
> whoever
> wrote it and then get it fixed ;)

I'll find out :-)

Non-qualified hostnames do get used, even to this list.  I
looked at a small collection of spam and saw hardly any
random "hostname" parts, but the sample is biased (it got
through some filters) and very small.

David