[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:58:19 -0400 |
>Well, I agree that it's long, but this isn't a transient error, it's an
>upgrade issue and that's a place where at least one person (me) doesn't
>expect things to break. So giving explicit instructions seems OK to me
>even if they're long.
Fair enough. Although technically the issue is more with the DRAFT
rather than components file; you could always delete the From: header
from the draft even if your components were correct. How about this
text:
Your draft file does not contain a From: header; this version of nmh
requires that all draft messages contain one. See the default
component templates for examples and insure that your draft contains
a valid From: header.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jon Steinhart, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Tethys, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18