[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:31:45 +0100 |
Norm wrote:
> The basic philosophy and reason-for-existence of mh and of nmh is that
> that's not the way to go. I should be allowed -- nay encouraged -- to
> use file system tools to manipulate mh constructs.
+1. MIME has made that more difficult at the moment, but it is still a
target to be aimed at IMO.
Cheers, Ralph.
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/29
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/04/29
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, David Levine, 2012/04/26