[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:22:57 -0400 |
>He?r??e i???s s??o?me g?arb??l?ed tex??t.
>
>He.r..e i...s s..o.me g.arb..l.ed tex..t.
Hm. I see your point, but I'm sort of torn here. Do we care about
obscuring the surrounding text? I mean, the original bug report
came as the result of a spam message; I don't think this is a problem
in the normal case, is it? To me "?" more indicates something went
wrong than "." (and U+FFFD means that even more).
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Earl Hood, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/04/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/16