nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was


From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:09:24 -0700

On 2012-03-26, at 12:26 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:

>> Well, what if GNU Mailutils folks buy these changes? Then they would
>> have to change the header fields to mailutils-* which would be annoying.
>> Worse, it would then make the header fields incompatible when in fact
>> they would be compatible.
> 
> This header is just an implementation wart ... it's really only to
> communicate between different programs.

And this is why it's wrong to pretend they are headers.  It leads to exactly 
this sort of misunderstanding.  I still say the syntax should chance so there's 
no confusion as to what they really are – meta commands to nmh programs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]