Re: [Nmh-workers] Understanding nmh (aka. What's the goal)

[Ralph Corderoy]

Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I would be surprised (stunned, really) if anyone was still using MH 
> *exclusively* as their MUA.  I haven't done so for years.

I'm another one that does use it exclusively and have done since the
early 1990s.

> But the solution is not to turn it into a python-based rewrite of
> Evolution.

I realise some of us are very attached to our MUA, and those of us that
use it exclusively have even more reason to be!, but I'm glad markus and
the others are raising issues rather than just have nmh languish.  Yes,
a fork may be one of the right choices for some of these newer ideas and
nmh shouldn't break backwards compatibility willy-nilly, but the
conversation shouldn't be curtailed needlessly.

Cheers,
Ralph.