[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:40:36 -0600 |
On January 29, 2010 at 23:01, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> If your interest is to only exchange messages with other
> nmh users, then I guess you won't care ... but I would suggest that
> if nmh doesn't evolve, at some point there won't be any other nmh
> users.
I agree.
For years, I have used a separate program I wrote to deal with
replying to MIME messages:
<http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/extras/mha-mhedit/mha-mhedit.html>
It ain't the most efficient thing, but it works. And I have
found over time that I've had to use it more frequently, even
for basic messages.
Ideally nmh should do what mha-mhedit basicly does.
Of course, the other big hurdle nmh has is that it is command-line
oriented, limiting those who may choose to use it to more advanced
computer users that appreciate the power and flexibilty the
command-line can provide.
I think the capabilities and maintenance of GUI front-ends to nmh
may be the determining factor if nmh stays around or fades away.
--ewh
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Joel Reicher, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?,
Earl Hood <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), bergman, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Sean Kamath, 2010/01/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/27