[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?)
From: |
Michael Richardson |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?) |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:48:39 -0500 |
>>>>> "markus" == markus schnalke <address@hidden> writes:
markus> Use a simple forwarding MTA (like nullmailer or ssmtp)
markus> instead.
okay. That would work for me.
The work would still be there to essentially:
a) rip out everything else.
b) adjust packages such that nullmailer/ssmtp is a dependancy.
c) provide an interface to collect the user's various
relay authentication tokens and configure said mailer.
markus> For the user, shipping an own forwarder is not much different than
markus> providing a good tutorial on how to use an external program for the
markus> job. And if it is a problem, then this user is hardly a user of nmh
markus> anyway.
nmh is the swiss-army knife of mail user agents.
We have several graphical MUAs that sit on top of it, and I'd like to
see more of them, not fewer. I do not want thunderbird and all the like
to have to reinvent everything.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] address@hidden http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, Michael Richardson, 2010/01/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?), Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?), markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] external MTA (was: nmh @ gsoc?), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2010/01/29
should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), bergman, 2010/01/27