[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:17:31 -0400 |
Jon writes:
> Based on the recent emails, I am thinking about a small modification
> to sendfile() in whatnowsbr.c. This change would be to skip the test
> for automimeproc if attach (in Whatnow(), would have to be made global)
> is set.
>
> This change would keep things from getting confused if someone has
> automimeproc set to 1 and also tried to use the whatnow attach stuff.
>
> I recall that there was a flurry of discussion a while ago about changes
> that some wanted to make to the attach code but I don't know whether or
> not that resulted in any actual work. Thought that I'd ask rather than
> searching for it.
There were some changes, but they're orthogonal. The
changes just affect the formatting of the attachments,
such as to optionally include a Content-Disposition
header, or suppress the Content-ID header.
David
> Anyway, any objection to my making the above change?
>
> Jon
- [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Robert Elz, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions,
David Levine <=