[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1 release candidate 4
From: |
Oliver Kiddle |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1 release candidate 4 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:18:24 +0200 |
On 28 Sep, Harald Geyer wrote:
>
> If you are going to apply my patch then please also apply the changes
> proposed by Robert Elz. Other than that I don't know of any issues.
> I'm using it since I posted it to the list. Don't know whether anybody
> else is testing it too.
I heard no complaints so I've applied the patch (+ proposed changes) and
backed out the old workaround. It'd be good if you can check that what I
put in CVS is correct.
Can we perhaps sort out giving CVS access to some more of the people
that have written patches recently? I don't mind clearing a backlog of
patches but I don't want to be dealing with all future patches. And as
this vfork issue has shown, it is very difficult to fully understand all
the patches.
Oliver
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1 release candidate 4,
Oliver Kiddle <=