[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2005 11:06:28 -0400 |
>it sounds like a couple of people have some fresh or renewed
>energy for making progress. given that, it would be really
>really great if this thread didn't die off like others like it in
>the past. to keep the rest of us from waiting in suspense, are
>ken and jon working out a new maintenance agreement of some sort?
Jon sent me some email privately; I've set aside some time today
to poke around savannah and figure out what needs to be done.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jerry Peek, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jon Steinhart, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development,
Ken Hornstein <=
- [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Dan Harkless, 2005/05/16