[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh
|
From: |
Bill Wohler |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:20:02 -0700 |
Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> wrote:
> Neil W Rickert wrote:
> > nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably
> > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.
>
> Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU
> project "mailutils"?
Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH
support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though.
I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or
not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.