Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

[Neil W Rickert]

Jon Steinhart <address@hidden> wrote on Sep 16, 2004:

>Is there any sort of wish list for nmh development?

Here is my wish list.

nmh is rotten at the core.  There is a lot of cruft, and probably
buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.

What is badly needed (IMHO) is to document the various procedures,
and carefully review the code in each of them.  It will be easier to
add enhancements, when the core library is in better shape and is
adequately documented.

 -NWR