[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:03:21 -0500 |
On August 1, 2003 at 00:38, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Matthew Burke <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I want to run nmh on my laptop but I don't have an MTA installed.
> > Using inc to get email from my two POP accounts works just fine but I
> > would prefer to run everything through slocal so that I can filter it.
> > Is there a way to do this without installing an MTA and then using
> > something like fetchmail to grab from the POP accounts?
>
> While it's not what you're asking, I've installed sendmail, postfix, and
> (the Debian default of) exim. The last was the easiest. And it makes
> fetchmail and procmail possible without much pain at all. So, I think
> the answer to your question is no, but I don't think the alternative is
> as bad as you think.
You should be able to use fetchmail with procmail. Fetchmail has
the -m option to specify a delivery agent to use instead of forwarding
the messages to an SMTP host. For example:
fetchmail -m "/usr/bin/procmail -d %T"
I would guess it is possible to have fetchmail invoke slocal
directly:
fetchmail -m "/usr/lib/nmh/slocal -addr %T -sender %F"
But I would try things out first.
--ewh
- [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Matthew Burke, 2003/08/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Ken Hornstein, 2003/08/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Bill Wohler, 2003/08/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal,
Earl Hood <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Pat Foley, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Jeffrey C Honig, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, chad Brown, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Brian Sammon, 2003/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about slocal, Brian Sammon, 2003/08/03