[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch]
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch] |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2016 22:25:04 +0200 |
On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 21:58, Tito wrote:
> after a lot of fiddling this are my results, nano 2.5.3:
> 1) original source: search history does not work but nano works
> 2) with your patch: as soon as you do a search nano segfaults,
>
> ^W ahahaha <Enter> boom
:|
> Ideas about how to debug it even If I don't
> use the N900 nowadays I would like to fix
> it.
Run 'valgrind --leak-check=full --track-origins=yes src/nano 2>TRAIL',
search for something, and after it segfaulted look at the TRAIL file.
Or if it does not segfault, just exit nano after the search, and look
at the TRAIL file.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - mmm... Fastmail...
- [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Benno Schulenberg, 2016/05/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Benno Schulenberg, 2016/05/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch],
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Benno Schulenberg, 2016/05/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], alpha, 2016/05/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Benno Schulenberg, 2016/05/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Benno Schulenberg, 2016/05/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], Tito, 2016/05/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] solving a history bug in nano [patch], alpha, 2016/05/31