[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:10:28 -0400 |
On 04 Apr 2016 20:51, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 04:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > they've removed the old git repo and i've pushed up my copy now.
> > feel free to make any announcements.
>
> Should we also make a final commit to SVN, to say that development
> has moved to git and the SVN repo is dead / abandoned / left as a
> monument?
makes sense to me. could add a flag file like '!!MOVED-TO-GIT' or
update the configure file to use AC_MSG_ERROR([moved to git]). i
don't think we'd want to delete all the files.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/04/01
- [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/04/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Mike Frysinger, 2016/04/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/04/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Jordi Mallach, 2016/04/08