[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions...

From: Chris Allegretta
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions...
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:48:32 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:03PM -0500, David Ramsey wrote:
> Same preference here, especially after reading through some of the
> proposed alternatives (no offense to anyone of course).  The GPL3/GFDL2
> dual licensing Jordi proposed doesn't sound too bad to me, though, if
> the FSF decides to start caring about it (see below).

Yup, if we have to it seems a reasonable alternative.

In general my reading of the GPL 3 is that it's a pretty reasonable 
license in its final form, and I can't think of any good reasons why one 
would not want a text editor to be licensed with it.  Having not seen 
any substantial arguments to the contrary I want to lend my support of 
changing the code license to GPL3. 

Chris A
Chris Allegretta


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]