[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:16:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:02, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> No problem. Would you try getting the latest CVS, applying the
> following patch, running nano WITHOUT the -O/--morespace option (as the
> debugging output is on the line that that option makes part of the edit
> window) so that it crashes, and telling me what results are shown during
> the entire session? Thanks in advance.
well if i use a terminal size of 81x24 it crashes at startup:
line 1: allocated 83 bytes, index == 88, converted length == 89
also, it'd be easier to capture the output if that statement wrote to
stderr ...
-mike
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/02/03