[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] Re: Not so good things in .11

From: Jordi Mallach
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Re: Not so good things in .11
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:22:57 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:22:54AM -0700, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> very odd.  I did the standard make dist yes, I'll have to investigate 
> this.  Is there any possibility that it something to do with the new 
> version of gettext?

I'd doubt it, but it could be, yes. I also noticed that your
post-release commit didn't update the po files, as you always did.
That's very probably related.

> I rm'ed the old nano.port and did a CVS update, now I have:
> ls -l nano.pot
> -rw-r--r--    1 chrisa   chrisa      15563 Oct  4 08:25 nano.pot

-rw-r--r--    1 jordi    jordi       27247 Oct  4 01:09 nano.pot

What is in the POT-Creation-Date of your .pot?
What do you get with ./update --pot?

What version of gettext are you using, anyway?

Jordi Mallach PĂ©rez  --  Debian developer
address@hidden     address@hidden
GnuPG public key information available at

Attachment: pgpQDN5XZHhv_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]