Re: [Nano-devel] nanobits3.patch committed

[David Benbennick]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 05:11:25AM -0700, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> ... I'd rather not see a large chunk of the code become static. ...
> 
> ... let me know what you think about this.

Okay, no more static functions.

I wonder if it is a good idea to include prototypes in proto.h for all
non-static functions?  As the code now stands, I could add a function
named print1opt to any source file other than nano.c.  There are no
compiler errors, but the linker bombs.  By having a prototype for nano.c's
version of print1opt, the problem would be caught by the compiler.

pgp2AdSpAuH7S.pgp
Description: PGP signature