Re: Extended regex badness (Was: Re: [Nano-devel] homepage - "latest version 1.0.9")

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

--- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:26:44PM -0700, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
>> --- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> Apparently so; sorry I missed that.  Changing the "\{" and
>> "\}" to "{" and "}" in the c-file regex fixes it.
>> 
>> I just looked it up.  According to the regex(7) manpage, {
>> and } denote bounds in extended regexps, while in ordinary
>> regexps, \{ and \} denote bounds, and { and } are ordinary
>> characters.  So changing the \{ and \} in the c-file regex
>> to { and } will fix it.  Sorry I missed that; I apparently
>> tested all the regex-using functions except for color ...
>
>*laugh*, no need to apologize when I'm being too lazy to RTFM :) I will 
>update the nanorc.sample in CVS and my local .nanorc.

And I probably shouldn't say the same thing twice, as I just
noticed I did.  (Note to self: must proofread posts more
carefully.)


_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

_____________________________________________________________
Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with address@hidden by 
Everyone.net  http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag