[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] merged patch

From: Dwayne Rightler
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] merged patch
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:45:05 -0600 (CST)

In the cvs tree when you do a ^R for the second time in multibuffer mode
to add a new file, the bottom menu has 2 ^T options...

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Chris Allegretta wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:41:20PM -0500, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> >
> > Ack, I'm surprised gcc lets this go through without a complaint.  I dont
> > think this type of declaration is portable.  I'll try and bang on this
> > patch this weekend, there just seems to be something about seems
> > like we're doing an awful lot of memory allocations.  Considering the
> > program is (in theory) exiting with abnormal status I would tend to try
> > and keep the malloc()ing to a minimum.  Let me have a look.
> Okay, the weekend came early ;-)  I was able to fix the
> get_next_filename up to my liking so I committed the patch.  I think I
> left some stuff out of the ChangeLog (bad me!).  Trying again to go
> through these memory cleanup patches is a bit of a bitch, too may
> different emails :)
> Chris A
> --
> Chris Allegretta
> "Share and Enjoy" - Douglas Adams, 1952 - 2001
> _______________________________________________
> Nano-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]