[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page
From: |
Gour |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:37:40 +0200 |
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:17:11 +0200
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Keller <address@hidden> wrote:
Thomas> Well, if I can avoid any other tool, then this should be
Thomas> preferred. After all the solely reason for this work is to
Thomas> generate a man page, I don't want texinfo, PDF, HTML output or
Thomas> whatsoever from it. We have a great online manual, that should
Thomas> be enough.
That's OK, but I suggested pandoc in order to have one-source for
different outputs, i.e. to have same help text for command reference
available in man page as in online manual.
Thomas> What I meant with or rather hoped to get feedback for when I
Thomas> asked "is it worthwhile to go down this route any further?" was
Thomas> if the _information_ in their current form as they're provided
Thomas> by the current mechanism is suitable for a decent man page.
See above. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6
----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] monotone man page, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone man page, Aaron W. Hsu, 2010/06/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone man page, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page, Lapo Luchini, 2010/06/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone man page, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/30
Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone man page, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/30