[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] BUG: Windows version doing an anonymous pull
From: |
Phil Hannent |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] BUG: Windows version doing an anonymous pull |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:35:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Stephen Leake wrote:
I don't believe there is a monotone that comes "with MinGW".
Indeed, I meant the cygwin which was clearly apparent to you from my version.
Sorry for the confusion.
type -a mtn
$ type -a mtn
mtn is /usr/bin/mtn
mtn is /bin/mtn
mtn is /cygdrive/k/Program Files/monotone/mtn
mtn is /cygdrive/d/Program Files/monotone/mtn
mtn is /cygdrive/k/Program Files/monotone/mtn
mtn is /usr/bin/mtn
As Timothy pointed out, the MinGW and Cygwin mtn's look for monotonerc
and the keys directory in different places
Indeed, however my use case is that I have a project which I am working on for
my employer and I use the Windows version for (which works great) and the cygwin
version which I use for working on Pidgin builds. I wanted a copy of the
Guitone repository due to having a crash in it and just used the windows one
which failed.
While I was aware of the two different locations I can confirm that they contain
the same information as I started my work project using the cygwin version (with
the keys from there) and changed to the MinGW version.
The monotonerc file in both locations just contains the get_passphrase function.
The keys folder contains 2 keys.
Is there something which would have permitted the cygwin one to work and the
mingw one not too within any files found in the .monotone or monotone folders?
Regards
Phil Hannent
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Monotone-devel] BUG: Windows version doing an anonymous pull, Timothy Brownawell, 2008/07/29