[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: There's something FISHY with the latest code...
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: There's something FISHY with the latest code... |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:57:30 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:51:58 +0100, Bruce Stephens
<address@hidden> said:
monotone> Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
monotone>
monotone> [...]
monotone>
monotone> > But you're right that that probably means get_current_revision_id is
monotone> > a bit wrong: maybe it ought to be get_base_revision_id or something?
monotone>
monotone> Shows how out of touch I am. There is such a thing, of
monotone> course (called get_base_revision_id).
You and me both, bud. I completely missed that one, and didn't read
Zack's mail well enough (he does mention get_base_revision_id!)...
Sorry for the stirr, folks!
monotone> I guess the question is should there be a special case for
monotone> when there's no changes, so that get_current_revision_id
monotone> returns the same as get_base_revision_id? (My hunch is that
monotone> it doesn't matter, so it may as well be left as it is.)
Since there is get_base_revision_id, I don't care any more :-).
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis