|
From: | Bruce Stephens |
Subject: | [Monotone-devel] Re: Merging an ancestor with one of its grandchildren |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:02:57 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Koelman <address@hidden> writes: [...] > So I ended up committing a trivial change to B, creating B3 and then > merged Z to B3. This felt really hacky and I don't like this > solution. Was there a better one? Isn't this exactly suitable for propagate?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |