[Monotone-devel] Re: monotone evaluation in commercial project [long]

[Peter Simons]

rghetta  writes:

 > Repository size: if we were to use monotone for
 > development, perhaps this would be our biggest problem.
 > [...] 

 > A possible solution would be the ability to make a
 > shallow copy of the central repo, where by "shallow" I
 > mean the smallest revision tree who could preserve branch
 > heads without throwing away the common ancestor needed
 > for merging.

If this capability were added I would be one happy user
because I'm having the exact same problem (and see the exact
same solution).

Peter