[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: using sqlite as provided in debian unstable
From: |
Tomas Fasth |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: using sqlite as provided in debian unstable |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:59:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Stephens wrote:
| monotone uses an 8K page size, whereas sqlite 2.8.15 uses a 1K
| one. I don't know exactly what implications that difference
| has---presumably performance. If I understand things correctly,
| this difference will disappear with sqlite 3, but that may not
| arrive for a while.
Can anyone recall why it was decided necessary to change the page
size for sqlite as bundled with monotone? Was it a major improvement
in performance, or something else? Can I assume it to be safe to run
monotone on a default sqlite page size?
- --
Tomas Fasth <address@hidden>
GnuPG 0x9FE8D504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBNf/lwYdzVZ/o1QQRAhOxAJsGuqyLnKx2nePsdk6446RPorvzdQCfaFL+
h6YRmqCawubNJQ5Nsih+FL0=
=2SNc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: using sqlite as provided in debian unstable,
Tomas Fasth <=
[Monotone-devel] Re: using sqlite as provided in debian unstable, Bruce Stephens, 2004/09/01