[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check"
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check" |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:19:47 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on 16 Aug 2004 13:47:11 +0200, Peter Simons
<address@hidden> said:
simons> Richard Levitte writes:
simons>
simons> > You need the following:
simons>
simons> > 1. the branch name
simons> > 2. the key that signed the branch cert
simons> > 3. the list of <branch,key> trust tupples.
simons>
simons> > You get 1 and 2 from the branch cert.
simons>
simons> What if the certificate -- for which I have to decide
simons> whether to trust it or not -- is not a BRANCH certificate? I
simons> would like to accept a, say, APPROVE signed by Graydon in
simons> the net.venge.monotone branch, but not in the
simons> simons.super.duper.private.stuff branch. How do I implement
simons> that?
Ah, you don't today. That would require get_manifest_cert_trust to
have a different set of arguments. Basically, "signers", "name" and
"val" would have to be replaced with a table of triples <signers,
name, val>.
Maybe this is something for Graydon to think about...
simons> What about ANCESTOR, for instance? Won't trusted ANCESTOR
simons> certificates be used for 3-way merges, regardless of the
simons> branch they are in? In that case, trusting (or not trusting)
simons> BRANCH won't be good enough.
simons>
simons> Or do I misunderstand something?
Probably not, but understand that you previously only talked about
branches. As of this email from you, we're getting into a whole
different level of difficulty. Or did *I* misunderstand something?
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/08/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", graydon hoare, 2004/08/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/08/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Peter Simons, 2004/08/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/08/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Peter Simons, 2004/08/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/08/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Peter Simons, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/08/16
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Peter Simons, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check",
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <=
- [Monotone-devel] permission (was Re: version 1.14 fails "make check"), graydon hoare, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Derek Scherger, 2004/08/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: version 1.14 fails "make check", Derek Scherger, 2004/08/09