[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-debian] monotone-viz FTBFS

From: Markus Wanner
Subject: Re: [Monotone-debian] monotone-viz FTBFS
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:57:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0

On 05/24/2014 12:38 PM, Francis Russell wrote:
> Correction, please use this revision instead:
> 8303556f0339c4b3bc942b9d2022cb2c8d106c00
> It fixes an additional couple of lintian warnings about hardened build
> flags and targets in debian/rules.

Great, thanks.

With that rev, monotone-viz builds fine on my Debian/testing box and
passes a smoke test.

I get the following set of lintian warnings:

> N: Unpacking packages in group monotone-viz/1.0.2-3
> N: ----
> N: Processing changes file monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch source amd64) 
> ...
> N: ----
> N: Processing source package monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch source) ...
> P: monotone-viz source: duplicate-in-relation-field in source build-depends: 
> debhelper (>= 7), debhelper
> W: monotone-viz source: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9
> W: monotone-viz source: vcs-field-uses-unknown-uri-format vcs-mtn 
> mtn://
> E: monotone-viz source: invalid-standards-version
> P: monotone-viz source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
> N: ----
> N: Processing binary package monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch amd64) ...
> P: monotone-viz: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license 
> usr/share/common-licenses/GPL

The one error and the duplicate debhelper B-D seemed simple to fix, so I
did that in 0d99d764defcc7ed35002fecb942a0715e1f56be.

I'm not quite sure about
"package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9". debian/compat
states 9, debian/control says:
"debhelper (>= 7)".

I'd also appreciate if the changelog would fit 80 columns. Not sure if
that's required by the policy or not, though.


Markus Wanner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]