Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone and usher

[Ludovic Brenta]

Richard Levitte writes:
> ludovic> Richard Levitte <address@hidden> writes:
> ludovic> > Basically, it's a setup similar to 'monotone' and
> ludovic> > 'monotone-server'
> ludovic> >
> ludovic> > Perhaps the package names are poorly chosen.  That could
> ludovic> > easily be changed, though.
> ludovic> 
> ludovic> Yes, I think it would be a good idea to rename them to
> ludovic> "usher" and "usher-server".
>
> Hmmm, according to your policy, it would seem I shouldn't commit any
> new changes to org.debian.usher for now.  Perhaps that wasn't exactly
> your intention, so should I create org.debian.usher.for-usher-1.0?

No, the policy is in terms of the target release of Debian you want to
upload to.  If you intend to upload to unstable (after the freeze is
lifted) then org.debian.usher is the appropriate branch.  If you want to
upload to experimental then the appropriate branch is
org.debian.usher.experimental.

However, there has been no upload of usher at all so far, so we could
make an exception and allow uploads to experimental from the main
branch, org.debian.usher.  This obviates the need for any sub-branch.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.